I don't think that there is a "perfect line" that easily and uncontestedly (is that a word?) retains its perfection outside its own context. It's a complicated issue to say it that way, however, because it must be remembered that not every poem has a perfect line hidden in it. But context isn't always the poem (sometimes can't it be the subject matter?) I think that there are lines that retain something of what I consider 'perfection' outside of their own poems.
In short, it all really depends on what the reader is looking for in a poem.
For me, perfect lines are characterized by delicate, careful eloquence, and a rushing feeling in your chest, like falling from a great height. One example comes from "Scheherezade" by Richard Siken:
Tell me how all this, and love too, will ruin us. These, our bodies, possessed by light. Tell me we’ll never get used to it.
The spacing gets a bit messed up in transit, but there it is. It's about, as one review of the collection said, "nerve wracked love."
no subject
In short, it all really depends on what the reader is looking for in a poem.
For me, perfect lines are characterized by delicate, careful eloquence, and a rushing feeling in your chest, like falling from a great height. One example comes from "Scheherezade" by Richard Siken:
Tell me how all this, and love too, will ruin us.
These, our bodies, possessed by light.
Tell me we’ll never get used to it.
The spacing gets a bit messed up in transit, but there it is. It's about, as one review of the collection said, "nerve wracked love."