[identity profile] swtytoothdmdmen.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] greatpoetry
Introduction to Poetry
Billy Collins


I ask them to take a poem
and hold it up to the light
like a color slide

or press an ear against its hive.

I say drop a mouse into a poem
and watch him probe his way out,

or walk inside the poem's room
and feel the walls for a light switch.

I want them to waterski
across the surface of a poem
waving at the author's name on the shore.

But all they want to do
is tie the poem to a chair with rope
and torture a confession out of it.

They begin beating it with a hose
to find out what it really means.

Billy Collins is trying to soften your brain.

Date: 2004-10-03 07:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jane-klimt.livejournal.com
Sure, waterskiing is fun, but so are swimming and scuba-diving. There's nothing wrong with getting into the depths of a poem.
(deleted comment)
From: [identity profile] jane-klimt.livejournal.com
I agree that the poem itself is not actually forbidding the deeper reading of poetry. If, however, you look at it in the context of Collins' work - a textbook of work "accessible at first glance" for students - a collection of "Poetry for the senses" ("poetry you only have to glance at to enjoy!")- it becomes harder to deny that Collins is in effect scorning all poetry that requires thought to understand.
This particular poem is, of course, accesible at a glance. One can read it, smile, nod, and move on without giving it much thought. It is presented in a way almost impossible to disagree with - until you realize that everything he has been working towards as one of our most beloved poet laureates is brainless poetry.
Now, I am not, at all, saying that the surface of poetry is a bad place to be. The surface - the words themselves, in my mind, though in Collins' case the meaning also is on the surface - is perhaps the most important part of the poem. Complexity of language as connected to meaning, however, should not be eliminated or reviled. As a passionate admirer of John Berryman's "Homage to Mistress Bradstreet," I am still working my way into the poem. The surface I have enjoyed many times, thrilling at the word choice and order even when unsure what they mean. The further into the poem I find myself, though, the more I appreciate and enjoy Berryman's masterful writing.
From: [identity profile] vermillion-sky.livejournal.com
it's true that collins writes poetry that is "easy" and "accessible," and i think some poetry snobs (like myself, for instance,) dislike it, or refuse to like it, for that reason. i, too, prefer poems that don't immediately yield up all they have to offer in the very first reading. however, i don't think collins' poems are "brainless," as you say they are. rather, they are poems for people who don't "get" poetry, people who think that poetry is, by definition, inscrutable and difficult. true, his work consists of a few gems amidst a pile of rubble, but can't one say the same about most other poets as well?

July 2025

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
1314 1516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 28th, 2026 11:10 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios